Search for: "WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY" Results 381 - 400 of 1,281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
He mused: “If the Senate were to act in a manner seriously threatening the integrity of its results, convicting, say, upon a coin-toss, or upon a summary determination that an officer of the United States was simply a ‘bad guy,’ . . . judicial interference might well be appropriate. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Huq, University of Chicago – Law School. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers College of Law, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZModerator:Joel Kurtzberg – Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NYWhile the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:26 am by mwright
    Happy Searching,   The Fastcase Team     PUBLISHER – Morgan Morrissette Wright, Fastcase EDITOR-IN-CHIEF – Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia, Samuel Weiss Faculty Scholar and Clinical Professor of Law, Founding Director of the Center for Immigrants’ Rights Clinic, Penn State Law in University Park EDITOR – Danielle M. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And the federal law in New York imposed liability on the state not because the state had done anything to create the waste, but because the state chose not to regulate persons within its borders according to federal preferences.Five years later, the Printz Court applied and extended New York to protect not just state legislators but state executive officials, too. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.Wright, Erik Olin. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
Hirsch, Professor of Law Ohio State Moritz College of Law and Faculty Director, Program on Data and Governance, for the invitation, and to Porter Wright Morris and Arthur for their support of this lecture series.The title of the lecture gives away its central objective--to consider the now unmistakable movements of two quite distinct political and ideological systems, the United States and China, toward an embrace of cultures of data driven governance as a supplement to… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:08 pm by Shea Denning
Wright did not waste any time settling back into his role. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 9:10 pm by Reuel Schiller
Wright Mills, each quite popular in their own right. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Mille [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Of course, HLR hopes that by asserting independence from a university that receives federal funding it can avoid liability altogether. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:45 am by Jennifer Brand
 Since 2002, Dave has served as an adjunct professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, where he’s taught his course on managing complex cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(Many private universities face the same difficulties, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions.) [read post]