Search for: "WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY"
Results 381 - 400
of 547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court ruled against the drugmaker Wyeth holding that pharmaceutical companies can be held liable for harm from medicines that carry warnings approved by federal regulators. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:01 pm
I am also happy for all of America as the threat of litigation keeps these pharmaceutical companies somewhat honest. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:55 pm
As previously blogged about, Diana Levine lost her arm due to complications after being given the anti-nausea medication Phenergan, manufactured by pharmaceutical giant, Wyeth, incorrectly. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:50 am
Without state tort liability, the drug companies would be absolved of any responsibility for the safety of drug labeling. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The drug company, Wyeth Pharmaceutical, had asked the justices to throw out the award on the basis of federal preemption. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:14 am
The six Justices who joined in upholding a verdict of nearly $6.8 million against the pharmacetical company Wyeth have sent their own warnings: to the industry, and to the Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:15 am
The justices, voting 6-3, said that pharmaceutical companies aren't shielded from suit by the Food and Drug Administration's approval of a treatment and its packaging information. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
The Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:38 am
In a 6-3 decision Wednesday, the court rejected Wyeth Pharmaceuticals’ claim that federal approval of its Phenergan anti-nausea drug should have shielded the company from state lawsuits like the one filed by Diana Levine of Vermont. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:04 am
The decision also rejected a claim by the pharmaceutical company, Wyeth, that a 2006 regulation of the Food and Drug Administration expressing concern about the impact of state failure-to-warn lawsuits on federal regulation should mean that such cases are barred. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Wyeth, Inc., 2006 WL 462470 (N.J. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:51 am
Last week we encountered arguments from the other side that any justice (at least any justice that might be defense oriented) owning any stock in any pharmaceutical company ought to recuse him/herself from Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:49 pm
No, says Doug Petkus, a Wyeth Pharmaceuticals spokesman. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(IP finance) Pharmaceutical Technology article on barriers to entry for generic pharma companies based in emerging economies (Afro-IP) The effects of IP protection on agricultural research: Patents are not the problem – response to Nature Biotechnology article ‘Patents Versus Patenting: Implications of Intellectual Property Protection for Biological Research’ (Patent Docs) SPC seminar – a brief report (The SPC Blog) (The SPC Blog) Ruminations… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Astrazenaca Pharmaceuticals, LP, 223 F.R.D. 659, 664 (M.D. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
It looks like the members seem to be comprised of giant insurance companies, big business, doctors' insurers and associations, and pharmaceutical and manufacturing giants. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:40 am
The Standard & Poor's 500 Pharmaceutical Index, including Pfizer and 12 other companies, rose 0.7 percent today. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 9:25 am
"The pharmaceutical industry just doesn't have enough money anymore to support these big companies and all their employees," said Les Funtleyder, a pharmaceutical analyst at Miller Tabak in New York. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 6:50 am
The rule discourages medical device manufactures and pharmaceutical companies from updating warning labels with hazard information without prior FDA approval, a blatant attempt to influence the Supreme Court’s decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:06 am
Product and pharmaceutical liability lawyers have been seriously worried about the impending outcome of Wyeth vs. [read post]
