Search for: "Wait v. Second Judicial District Court" Results 381 - 400 of 610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm by Dave
I have to say that, at the risk of being controversial, Westminster’s arguments are absolutely in line with the House of Lords judgment in Ahmad v Newham LBC and that they were not successful in this case demonstrates what I think is becoming a little clearer, that (a) the lower courts are subtly narrowing that judgment, and (b) it may well take another UKSC decision to give clarity. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The District Court found that these investors were not entitled to benefit from the American Pipe class action tolling rule because they did not wait to file their individual suits until after the court decided whether to certify the class. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
So, at the same time that the Court undertakes to slay other giants, Mississippians can only hope that they will not have to wait another century for a judicial knight-errant. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Richard Hunt
Merrill,³ a decision that was promptly made meaningless when the Supreme Court stayed the effect of the District Court’s preliminary injunction. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Joining them for a second go-round is Christeson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm by Ron Coleman
So too said the Eastern District of Virginia in 2014 in Belmora LLC. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am by Norman L. Eisen
In December, Smith asked for 21 days between the Court granting cert and oral argument (per the U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:27 pm by John Ross
" Seventh Circuit: We reversed and remanded in January, and yet the district court has taken no further action in this case—evidently waiting to see if the Supreme Court will grant certiorari. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Rachel Rebouche
Supreme Court handed down its decision in June Medical Services v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
The Supreme Court has relisted those original five cases a second time now. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am by Tian Lu
– more commonly referred to as Jin Yong v Jiang Nan, the pseudonyms of the complainant and the primary defendant [case reference: Tianhe District People’s Court of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province (2016) Guangdong 0106 Minchuzi No. 12068 (in Chinese)]. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]