Search for: "Wales v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 756
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
United States The EARN IT Act has returned to the Senate and House, which has prompted a response from Riana Pfefferkorn reminding Congress of the problems the proposed legislation causes for encryption, privacy and online speech, without guaranteeing improvement to children’s safety online. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:00 am by Liam Thornton
In a recent United Kingdom Supreme Court decision, HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department the question that arose was whether a person had to be ‘discrete’ in relation to their sexuality so as to avoid persecution by the state. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In most of the United States and, to some extent, the judiciary is responsible for regulation of lawyers. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation  (Winrow v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Men charged with breaching sanctions against Iraq in 2002 fail to convince Supreme Court that the UK had no power to create a criminal offence under the United Nations Act 1946. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by FM Librarian
Non-Refoulement, Socio-Economic Deprivation, and Paposhvili v Belgium," International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 29, no. 4 (Dec. 2017)- Preprint version of article. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
  Iorworth HOARE v the United Kingdom – 16261/08 [2011] ECHR 722 (12 April 2011)  Convicted sex offender and lottery winner loses Euro human rights appeal against post limitation date. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:41 am by Kyle Persaud
As ,Wikipedia explains, “In common law legal systems such as England and Wales and the United States, the term [civil law] refers to non-criminal law. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Wale, still include the substantive elements of the RJR-Macdonald test. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
He is a patent attorney advocate and appeared in the Court of Appeal for England and Wales on Wednesday in Lantana Ltd v Registrar of Patents. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 21 April 2022, the United States, Canada, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea and Chinese Taipei published a declaration establishing the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
For example, in the United Kingdom, widespread (adverse) publicity in the legal profession followed the English High Court's decision in J P Morgan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm by Giles Peaker
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
United States Florida: a former superintendent has had his lawsuit against the accounting firm Mauldin & Jenkins dismissed. [read post]