Search for: "Walker v. Day"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
Starting on Tuesday 24 April 2012 are the linked appeals of R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, which are listed for three days to be heard by a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Clarke, L Dyson and L Wilson). [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:55 pm
State v Walker 213 N.J. 281 (2013)4 Sixteen-month delay for DWI inhibited defendant’s speedy trial right. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
In King v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Flagship urls are all very well, said Robert, and can be highly memorable -- but the days of people typing them in full into their browsers are over and SEO can be expensive and its results unpredictable. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Proposition 8 was a constitutional amendment, passed in November 2008 (on the same day as the US Presidential election), which declared that marriage in California was limited to the union of a man and a woman. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 8:33 am
Brief of Digital Humanities and Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Authors Guild v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
In the District of Columbia, home to the famous Williams v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 5:07 am
Back in day we were able to bring many cases with the benefit of legal aid. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
Plaintiffs argue that they have to pray five times a day. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 5:56 am
He was arrested for trespass, but that charge was later dropped.The case is Grice v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:37 am
The Court of Appeals reverses and the plaintiff wins.The case is Colgan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
It features some fascinating anecdotes about day-to-day interactions between members of the Court and includes a winning quip from Justice Stevens. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:41 am
Speaking of the Supreme Court, the government has filed its brief in opposition to the writ of certiorari in the work product case, U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
In its opinion, the court cited United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Walker, 568 S.W.2d 622, 625 (Tenn. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
Walker, 11-1011, which presents (among other things) the question left open two Terms ago in Wood v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:07 am
Walker. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
While in Martin and Most Lord Walker coined a helpful phrase in saying “relates to” must be more than a “loose or consequential” link, it would be a mistake to elevate that phrase to the status of a test. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
Petroutsas, 580 F.3d 1000, 1018 (9th Cir. 2009); Walker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:20 pm
Days Inns of America, 212 Ga. [read post]
