Search for: "Wall v. State of California" Results 381 - 400 of 1,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Indeed, Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft all operate similar walled gardens or closed platform models as Apple, whereby the hardware, operating system, digital marketplace, and IAPs are all exclusive to the platform owner. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Ted Frank discusses the cert petition in Frank v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:28 am by Michael B. Stack
  Read more…       Despite State Court Order, NJ Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Responsible for Conditional Payments   On June 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey published its opinion in Taransky v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Venkat
CUS Nashville" "Facebook Messages/Wall Posts, Civil Discovery, and the Stored Communications Act -- Crispin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Cormac Early
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by S2KM Limited
"We’ve hit a home run for consumers,” announced Peter V. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by Kiera Flynn
  The United States recently filed a petition for certioriari in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
California, “which asks whether California’s status as a ‘sanctuary state’ is illegally hampering federal immigration law”; citing Supreme Court precedent, he argues that “[i]f it’s unconstitutional for the feds to commandeer the states into enforcing a federal gun control scheme, it’s also unconstitutional for the feds the commandeer the states into enforcing federal immigration policy. [read post]