Search for: "Ware v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 9:39 pm
” The ACLU further points out: Mohamed et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 10:08 am
The corrections director shall make all state records available for public scrutiny and the records shall be subject to audit by the Secretary of State.(10) Prison work products or services shall be available to any public agency and to any private enterprise of any state, any nation or any American Indian or Alaskan Native tribe without restriction imposed by any state or local law, ordinance or regulation as to competition with other public or private sector… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 6:41 pm
Recently, in People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:52 pm
In Jacobsen v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:01 pm
See, e.g., Ware v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Industrial Commission of Ohio Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0441n.06 Ware v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 2:14 am
Lucky for the prosecution, Ware let him off the hook and allowed the state to refile the case. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:40 am
Employer found to have unlawfully discriminated against employee because of age to pay back salary and an award for mental anguish and humiliationMatter of New York State Tug Hill Commn. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 05110, Decided on June 6, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Clark Waring Blackburn, Jr., was terminated from his position by Tug Hill in the course of "a reorganization. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:49 pm
District Judge Neil V. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 1:53 pm
At issue was section 12(1)(b) of the Canadian Trademarks Act which states that a trademark is not registrable if it is “clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive” of the “place of origin” of the wares or services. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 5:43 pm
In 88766 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
Again, I see some descriptiveness issues with this mark, as in being descriptive of the persons employed in the production of these wares. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 8:27 pm
[37] V. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 10:27 pm
Leary v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:29 pm
Why there is Kent V. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:06 am
The unanimous ruling in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 11:40 am
The style of cause is: See You In - Canadian Athletes Fund Corporation v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
(Elizabeth Parsons Ware) Max D. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:04 pm
Case name is United States v. [read post]
