Search for: "Warner v. Warner" Results 381 - 400 of 2,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
United States (06-1456), on whether the federal money laundering statute requires an attempt to create the appearance of legitimate wealth, and in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:46 pm
The WSJ.com Law Blog posts today about possible remedies for the problem of recusal of Supreme Court Justices due to stock ownership in one of the parties, noting that Chief Justice Robert’s recent recusal from a case resulted in a “problematic even-numbered panel” that rendered a 4-4 decision in Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
              The appellate court also emphasized the offer by Time Warner to accept a seven year period of binding arbitration and to maintain current compensation arrangements instead of withholding content. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:19 pm
              The appellate court also emphasized the offer by Time Warner to accept a seven year period of binding arbitration and to maintain current compensation arrangements instead of withholding content. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
And Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
In its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Warner Bros essentially argues that “copyright protection extends to the overall look and feel” of the Batmobile vehicle because it is a distinctive character, citing Halicki Films v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
  Steven Willis (Bristows) reports:  "Since that first rapid response seminar, Arnold J has issued a further judgment concerning Warner-Lambert’s right to amend the Patent after the trial and whether that amounted to an abuse of process (Generics (UK) t/a Mylan v Warner-Lambert [2015] EWHC 3370 (Pat)). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:41 pm
Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat) is the latest in a series of decisions in the ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of Lyrica. [read post]