Search for: "Washington v. Barnes"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2007, 2:18 pm
In today's Washington Post, Robert Barnes has this article on the interest in predicting the outcomes and authors of forthcoming Supreme Court opinions. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:15 am
” And in the Washington Post, Robert Barnes previews Florence v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the case yesterday for this blog; other previews come from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Bill Mears of CNN, and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Wade (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Justices say Supreme Court split by philosophical — not partisan — differences, but timing works against them (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer Feels Partisan Push to Retire (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) The Supreme Court Vaccine Case: Jacobson v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am
Here’s the Monday morning read: Clarence Thomas says Supreme Court leak has eroded trust in institution (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Move to Scrap Roe Opens Justices to ‘Politicians in Robes’ Label (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law) Abortion rights backers rally in anger over post-Roe future (Ashraf Khalil & David Sharp, Associated Press) The End of Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
WASHINGTON POST: Supreme Court restricts life without parole for juveniles By Robert Barnes Washington Post Staff Writer Tuesday, May 18, 2010 Juveniles may not be sentenced to life in prison without parole for any crime short of homicide, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday, expanding its command that young offenders must be treated differently from adults even for heinous crimes. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:32 pm
Director, Division of Taxation, and MBNA America Bank v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
Barnes, 2002-Ohio-68 (An alleged error is plain error only if the error is obvious.) [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes explores the possibility that President Obama would feel compelled to nominate a Protestant to the Court if Justice John Paul Stevens were to retire, leaving the Court with six Catholic and two Jewish Justices. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
Briefly: At the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on a recent study (also discussed in Joshua’s round-up on Friday) highlighting the ways in which the composition of current Court differs from those before it. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Jordan S. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
In other news, Robert Barnes has this piece in today's Washington Post on Lilly Ledbetter, the petitioner in Ledbetter v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm
One might think that such a concession is effectively no different than a guilty plea, and the decision whether to plead guilty is fundamental one for the defendant and not counsel (Jones v Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [1989]). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
” Barnes discusses the pending petition in Williams v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
” At the Washington Post, Robert Barnes noted that despite the margin, “there were signs of trepidation about the recognition of federal powers” within the several concurring opinions. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times has coverage of the opinion, as do Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Peter Urban of Arkansas News, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, and Reuters. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
Barnes & Noble 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Facebook’s “Browsewrap” Enforced Against Kids–EKD v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gobain Ceramics v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:53 am
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that "Issue of contraceptive coverage returns to Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:16 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that "Justices say it's enough to cite terrorism in declining visa applicant. [read post]
