Search for: "Weaver v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 2:49 am by Rumpole
""Did that Judge in Jacksonville overrule Marbuy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:54 am
GPS devices planted by the police are already not a Fourth Amendment issue, but state law may be different, as in New York's People v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am by thejaghunter
Weaver, II, New Bethlehem, PA RM2 Jerry Boyd Farr, Charleston, SC SA Jeffrei L. [read post]
8 May 2010, 9:15 am by Matthew Nelson
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Tus v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 10:54 am by Aaron Lindstrom
Justice Weaver wrote separately to state that she agreed “the plaintiff has a more persuasive position” and to agree with Justice Young. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:18 am by INFORRM
” Now after A, plainly the refusal to provide information to the media by the state does engage Article 10. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:54 pm
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.law.louisville.edu/cardinallawyer/node/233'; tweetmeme_service = 'bit.ly'; tweetmeme_source = 'chenx064'; The United States Supreme Court's blockbuster decision in Citizens United v. [read post]