Search for: "Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bone/Wal-Mart on error costs: source identification is expensive to determine, which I think the paper is clear about in struggling w/solutions. [read post]
14 May 2009, 5:14 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 340 F.3d 1246 (11th Cir. 2003), a case involving class certification under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), the district court concluded that consideration of damage awards, in conjunction with the plaintiff’s actual injury, was permissible. [read post]
The Court’s Decision Plaintiffs’ theory of commonality was rejected by Judge Kessler as identical to the failed theory presented in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Small Firm's Lawyers Not Waiting for Wal-Mart Fees The Recorder The $172 million Wal-Mart meal-break verdict won by The Furth Firm in 2005 ranks among the top 10 verdicts nationally, but few of the lawyers will be around to celebrate if and when the money arrives. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In support of the commonality requirement of Rule 23(a)(2), Plaintiffs cited directly to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition.  [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:22 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010), a Title VII gender discrimination case challenging pay and promotions involving 1.5 million class members. [read post]