Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Because of the limited punishments that can be imposed, "[c]riminal defamation defendants are not entitled to a trial by jury" and "state law does not afford indigent criminal defamation defendants the right to court-appointed counsel. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
E.g., Matthews v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:36 am
Officer William Lindsey disagreed. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:36 am
Officer William Lindsey disagreed. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:52 am
The citation for this claim is Hastings v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
(The Public Information Office will later pass along that Thomas is home today with flu-like symptoms.) [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm
The White House had released a document to the Committee staff that was intended to defend the President by impugning and rebutting public testimony that Presidential Counsel John Dean had given the month before. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
In his concurrence inTrump v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
He forcefully defended President Trump and admitted without remorse that he lies to the media. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
Radostitz then cited Kyles v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
Deborah Gerhardt: Office Actions could help you isolate the problem. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
But the NRA’s structural advantages, built over decades and defended by President Trump and congressional Republicans, remain in place. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:21 am
Facts: This case (Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
Plaintiffs' purported equitable cause of action, based only on an ultra vires claim, would have been unknown to William Blackstone, Chancellor Kent, or Justice Story. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
My contention is that this promise to “support and defend the Constitution” and to “well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office” imposes—at some point and under sufficiently dire circumstances—an obligation to take action against a president who has abused his office. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
In Katz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am
Attorney General William Barr explained the president’s final back-down as forced by timing constraints. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:05 pm
Most, even if not all, of the dreadful people in public office were elected in fair elections. [read post]
