Search for: "Williams v. State of New Jersey" Results 381 - 400 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2011, 3:17 am by Lyle Denniston
   The New Jersey Supreme Court, in a high-profile and precedent-setting decision in August (State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:28 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On September 16, 2011, a judge for the Superior Court of New Jersey issued a bench ruling in Imbert v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:33 am by Sheppard Mullin
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey joined the New Jersey Superior Court in weighing in on the issue of whether a retailer violates consumer privacy state law by requesting a customer's zip code at the point of purchase. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:19 am by Sheppard Mullin
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey joined the New Jersey Superior Court in weighing in on the issue of whether a retailer violates consumer privacy state law by requesting a customer's zip code at the point of purchase. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:43 am by Brendon Tavelli
District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that a putative class action lawsuit against home goods retailer Williams-Sonoma failed to state a claim under New Jersey law. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:28 pm by Sara Alexandre
Robert Imbert and the New Jersey Superior Court felt otherwise. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am by Sheppard Mullin
(“Williams-Sonoma”)  is currently pending in the District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:06 am by Sheppard Mullin
(“Williams-Sonoma”)  is currently pending in the District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
New Jersey, in which the Court held that a judge may only increase a sentence based upon facts found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as one example of the “perpetual dissent,” and he notes that the Justices will consider another case on this issue at their September 26 Conference. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am by Venkat
In 2001, Forchion unsuccesfully petitioned the New Jersey state courts to change his name to "NJWeedman.com. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:49 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have adequately stated a claim for breach of fiduciary duty under New Jersey law. [read post]