Search for: "Witte v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., The Role of Precedents in the United States: How Do Precedents Lose Their Binding Effect? [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
United States, a case initially brought in state court and removed by the government to federal court, challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
United States, No. 11-1324 (D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See also United Mexican States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:56 am
*Institute for Labour Law, KU Leuven, Belgium [1] United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
Rather, “in light of the analysis in [United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
Weeks and Tenney v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
Benjamin Wittes linked to it here. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
(Some immigrants who entered legally into the United States seeking asylum have also been separated from their children.) [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
(For another, quite critical, review, see Ben Wittes.) [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 Witt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
