Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
It is plain that Parliament can intervene (a word used deliberately) in a particular context to set up domestic law and to cater for its alteration as it sees fit. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
If words are not to be served they are words in the air but no agreement. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
On the issue of R (Francis) Lord Wilson stated that it was wrongly decided. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Rix, Lloyd and Wilson) gave its ruling in Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 753.At issue in this dispute was the shape of Whirlpool's retro-looking KitchenAid Artisan mixer and its rival, Kenwood's kMix. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:43 am
In the last couple of years there's been Led Zeppelin v Spirit and Marvin Gaye (the estate of) v Robin Thicke and Pharrell WilliamsAs a recent programme on BBC Radio 4 showed, there is a lot of activity in the area - with a new profession of forensic musicologist emerging as an important part of the picture. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Cases of the Day, NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
A recent interesting instance can be found in the decision delivered by Justice Bakhru of the Delhi High Court in the case of Monsanto v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 10:07 am
"Rembar details the fascinating case of Ashford v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
This decision is vast, running to 259 paragraphs and over 45,000 words, featuring a fully-fledged dissent from Sales LJ. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:24 am
OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
Lord, 2007 U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Applying Simms [1999] UKHL 33, he found that general or ambiguous statutory words are incapable of overriding fundamental rights. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:00 pm
" Andrew v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Cf Bush v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm
The court considered the application of the principle of ‘purposive construction’, derived originally from the words of Lord Diplock in the UK case of Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd [1982] RPC 183. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
In something of a coda, Lord Neuberger gave a concurring judgment. [read post]
