Search for: "Yorker v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
” Lauren Bateman provided a blow-by-blow readout of the hearing on the Department of Justice’s state secrets claim in Restis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:09 am
But when they speak of gravity knives today, it’s a very different animal, as revealed in Bronx Supreme Court Justice Troy Webber’s opinion in People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:29 am
In Holt v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:12 am
” Briefly: In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin discusses Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s criticism of the majority’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
In the most recent controversy, Levitt v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:24 am
So asks Amy Davidson at the New Yorker, who examines the continuing legal questions over the President’s campaign in Iraq and Syria. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
At the Council of State Governments, Lisa Soronen looks at the big picture, with brief previews of the issues that could affect states, while Adam Liptak of The New York Times previews Holt v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court resolved this landmark case in 1964, New York Times v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
Their stories came to light through Hurrell-Harring et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:25 pm
New York Sex Crime Attorneys, New York Rape Attorneys and Stephen Bilkis & Associates team up to be able to extend unparalleled legal services to New Yorkers. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
"The Los Angeles Review of Books reviews Clark Stoeckley's The United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
If so: [¶] (a) State all facts upon which you base this contention; [¶] (b) State the name, ADDRESS, and telephone number of each PERSON who has knowledge of those facts; and [¶] (c) Identify all DOCUMENTS that support your contention. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton weighs in on the events that have followed the Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
From People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Therefore, Viatek has not stated a claim for unfair competition under the Lanham Act and this counterclaim is dismissed. * Sussman-Automatic Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Department of State’s Foreign Terrorist Organization list. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:56 pm
Earlier this week, in People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
Earlier this week, in People v. [read post]
