Search for: "Young v. State of California"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:17 pm
In State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:55 am
Here in Wisconsin, a young lawyer who was representing a pro bono client in support of the state's recent consitutional amendment (now being challenged as improperly enacted) was met with an organized campaign of phone calls to her firm and had to drop the client. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:37 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:19 am
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 12:45 pm
But the Central District of California in Yoon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
Bank of America, the largest bank in the United States, has agreed to settle a Nationwide Class Action related to its overdraft and non-sufficient fund fee practices. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:14 pm
The case of Apodaca v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:22 pm
He based his argument on the California Supreme Court's determination in Mercer v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm
The Claimants obtained a subpoena in California and obtained Google’s records. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:57 am
In this vein, ARB spokesman, Stanley Young, succinctly stated, "a broadly worded writ puts at risk a range of efforts to move California to a clean energy economy and improve the environment and public health. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:25 am
That, in a nutshell, is what the Supreme Court must decide in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
The plaintiff had strong connections to both British Columbia and California, the latter also being the location of the defendant and all of its documents. [read post]
