Search for: "v. Atkins"
Results 381 - 400
of 900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterPer Michael Atkins: On March 19, Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, Jr. signed a bill into law that bans some forms of key word advertising. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
In Blistex Bracken v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:55 am
The first, co-authored with Sheri Lynn Johnson and Christopher Seeds is titled An Empirical Look at Atkins v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Tennessee 13-5086Issue: (1) Whether, in proceedings under Atkins v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Welcome to Blawg Review #325 — 325-and-a-tenth, to be exact. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:15 am
Florida, the Court will decide "whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:50 pm
Florida: Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 2:32 pm
(Lawson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
The new death penalty case from Florida raised this issue: “Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Florida, 12-10882, concerning the Sunshine State’s ability to define what constitutes mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Florida 12-10882Issue: Whether the Florida scheme for identifying mentally retarded defendants in capital cases violates Atkins v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
(See Ford v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 10:32 am
(See Atkins v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm
Originally posted 2010-12-01 20:08:12. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:18 pm
Atkins [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:25 pm
As Michael Atkins explains: In Sand Hill Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:15 am
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
That’s what Western District Judge Thomas Zilly found in his August 7 order on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in Experience Hendrix, LLC v. [read post]
