Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 3981 - 4000
of 95,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2007, 11:09 am
Levy granted the motion in part, and also directed the plaintiffs to appear for telephone depositions if needed, ruling as follows:Defendant Marie Lindor moves to compel plaintiffs to respond to Interrogatory 1 of her Third Interrogatories, seeking a listing of "all expenses" plaintiffs incurred in connection with the thirty-eight song recordings at issue in this litigation. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 9:37 pm
We've all seen 'em; it's time to talk about 'em: silly MDL tricks.It starts with a few plaintiffs filing a motion with the MDL Panel to centralize a set of product liability cases. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:44 am
To the contrary she was professional at all times. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 5:59 pm
The complaint alleges in part: Plaintiffs operate by their business practices, pursuant to their guiding principle— which is their faith in God—and receive grace and guidance from God in all their business practices, including Plaintiffs’ selection of health insurance....Based on the teachings of the Catholic Church, and their deeply held religious beliefs, Plaintiffs do not believe that contraception, sterilization, or abortion are… [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:12 am
With regard to the induced infringement, the Court wrote that the fact that the plaintiff and defendant are competitors in producing the goods covered by the patents-in-suit, that the plaintiff marked its goods with the pertinent patents, and that industry trade publications mentioned the existence of the plaintiff’s patents all gave rise to the inference that the defendant knew of the patents or turned a willful blind eye to their existence. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
The supervisor in charge of training sales staff made derogatory remarks about plaintiff's sexual orientation and lifestyle, and required her to watch a video featuring a minister who had "outspoken disdain for homosexuality" and believed "that all homosexuals are sinners." [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 10:40 am
BOP (D.D.C.) -- on sixth renewed summary judgment (which plaintiff did not oppose), ruling that BOP properly relied on Exemption 7(C) to withhold identification information used by employees to log into agency’s network.Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:21 am
(unpublished) -- affirming district court’s “well-reasoned” decision that plaintiff was not entitled to discovery and concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing filing sanctions on plaintiff and her attorney.Berk v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
Rather, it amounts to Plaintiffs seeking to exact a benefit from the local government and to “divest the [BOE] of its right to use what is, after all, its land. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:24 pm
The contract between the plaintiffs and American Express includes clauses requiring submission of all disputes to arbitration and waiving class arbitration procedures. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 5:35 am
Plaintiff amended her Complaint on January 26, 2016, and brings suit on her own behalf and on behalf of “all other similarly situated Allstate New Jersey... . [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:51 am
Prior to trial, the plaintiffs withdrew their complaint as to all defendants except Jeannine Giovanni, a physician, and Connecticut Surgeons, LLC. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
"[T]he indirect evidence provides strong support for inferring bad faith: [plaintiff's] initial failure to list [the] Controller [in discovery] despite its representation that the list contained all [of its] controllers sold between 1980 and 2002 . . . and, most telling, the removal of software related to [that] Controller from the list of controllers without adequate (or indeed any) explanation. . . . [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:24 am
The Plaintiff filed suit in Philadelphia. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Exhibits in the record also support [plaintiff's] contention that [defendant] attempted to use the threat of fees to persuade [plaintiff] to abandon all of his claims — including those claims based on [defendant's] admitted breach of the license agreement. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The court concluded that plaintiffs had adequately alleged that application of the CSA would substantially burden a sincere religious exercise, saying in part:Similar to part of Defendants’ arguments above relating to standing, and additionally the alternative request for stay below, Defendants argue under 12(b)(6) that the complaint fails to state a claim because, fundamentally, all of Plaintiffs’ grievances stem from their failure to obtain, much less apply… [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:01 am
Senator Grassley about a senior-level agency employee; and (3) agency properly redacted certain information pursuant to Exemption 5 (DPP) and Exemption 6.Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2024 are available here. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
[Plaintiff] has not pointed to any 'common issues' that would not be present in all infringement cases (i.e. claim construction). . . . [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:05 pm
The plaintiffs consulted North Carolina personal injury attorneys and began filing claims against all the usual suspects. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
Turtle Talk blog has links to all the pleadings in the case. [read post]
