Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 3981 - 4000 of 21,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2020, 6:57 am by Leland Garvin
The dangerous instrumentality doctrine, solidified in the 1920 Florida Supreme Court case of Southern Cotton Oil v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:57 am by Leland Garvin
The dangerous instrumentality doctrine, solidified in the 1920 Florida Supreme Court case of Southern Cotton Oil v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:12 am by Jon L. Gelman
Pursuant to Article V, Section I, Paragraph 14 of the New Jersey Constitution, I am returning Senate Bill No. 2354 (Second Reprint) with my recommendations for reconsideration.This bill would authorize the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance (“Commissioner”), upon the declaration by the Governor of a public health emergency or state of emergency, or both, to issue a bulletin prohibiting insurers and premium finance companies from canceling an… [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 3:00 am by Barry Sookman
New post: Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2020-12-05 https://t.co/YG6AMPCVz3 2020-12-06 Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2020-12-05 https://t.co/YG6AMPCVz3 2020-12-06 Protecting Trade Secrets in the Era of Virtual Meetings https://t.co/CDduEP8Ta9 2020-12-07 Geophysical wins license breach case over seismic data, 2020 ABQB 730 (CanLII) | Geophysical Service Incorporated v… https://t.co/S40TEgLZPt 2020-12-07 MasterCard, Visa investigating Pornhub over allegations… [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 10:20 am by Howard Bashman
And the Court’s order itself stated: The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm by Howard Bashman
Pennsylvania, No. 155 Orig., that begins, “The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
The State of Texas's motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 11:13 am by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
But that claim raises an interesting question: Are the United States’s sister democracies doing any better than the United States in countering disinformation? [read post]