Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 3981 - 4000 of 31,281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 7:20 am
  Sources: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/767/v/41 https://www.verywellfamily.com/dos-and-donts-for-winning-child-custody-2998180Read More [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 June, the Supreme Court will hear a Reference by the Attorney General and the Advocate General for Scotland – United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Kyle C. Velte
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 23 June 2021 in the case of Abbasi v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals [2021] EWHC 1699 (Fam) McFarlane P held there was jurisdiction to maintain or re-impose a reporting restriction order protecting the anonymity of clinicians and other treating staff involved in the care of a child, now deceased, who had been the subject of end of life proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction, where the order was to remain in force for a significant period following… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 2:13 pm by Ralf Michaels
Similar to previous cases, such as Mennesson v France, Labassee v France, andParadiso and Campanelli v Italy, this complaint originated from the refusal of national authorities to recognise the parent-child relationship established in accordance with foreign law on the ground that surrogacy is prohibited under national law. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Under that test, following the Supreme Court’s decision in In re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKSC 33, an appeal will be allowed where the decision of the lower court was “wrong”, whether in law or in fact. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 5:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2021.html Mayes v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm by Unknown
(Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2021.html Mayes v. [read post]
The Ruling is consistent with cumulative case law on the matter, including the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals’s decision in Morrissey v. [read post]