Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 207,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
Oracle Corp. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 1191, 1206 [under UCL, California employer’s failure to pay overtime wages to out-of-state employees was an unlawful business practice]; Tomlinson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:29 am
The Court has reversed itself and has stated now that it will direct liability in favor of plaintiffs in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:14 am
In Bess v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:22 am
In Moore v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Federal courts continued to give deference to state court factual findings, but for the roughly forty-year period beginning with the 1953 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:20 pm
Under United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:41 pm
Lower court materials here. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 12:51 pm
United States, the Supreme Court did away with this default. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
As stated on the California Supreme Court’s website, briefing on the case is deferred pending the Court’s decision in Brinker:The petition for review is granted. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:39 am
The court acknowledged Harrington v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:40 pm
This was in fact stated by the tribunal Burlington v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 6:57 am
The Supreme Court in Kahn v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 8:27 am
This is the ruling by the Kentucky Supreme Court in its recent decision, University of Louisville v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 10:05 am
Here is the abstract.Moody v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:20 am
They filed suit in the United States District Court under federal employment law. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
The opinion is City of Cleveland v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
Here: Matheson v Washington Cert Petition Questions presented: 1. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
Employers in the Golden State are well aware that last year in Dynamex v. [read post]
