Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 16,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Elias LJ said that Zambrano had “removed the requirement for even an exiguous cross-border link” before the principle applied. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The most notable cases from national courts are Subafilms, Ltd. v MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:09 pm
“Pursuant to CPLR 4111 (c), when the answers on a verdict sheet ‘are inconsistent with each other and one or more is inconsistent with the general verdict, the court shall require the jury to further consider its answers and verdict or it shall order a new trial,’” wrote the panel, quoting Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:24 am
We reject defendant’s stated effort to shoehorn an alleged appeal from a January 2, 2019 order in Lipin v Danske Bank into this appeal. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am
Cadence Bank v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am
This marks a return to Title IX for the court, which last year held in a closely watched decision that a right to cross-examination applies in university disciplinary hearings. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
§50-a of the New York State Civil Rights Law addresses the release of personnel records of police officers, firefighters correction officers and incumbents of certain other positions "used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion," which are considered confidential and which are not subject to inspection or review without the express prior written consent of the… [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
§50-a of the New York State Civil Rights Law addresses the release of personnel records of police officers, firefighters correction officers and incumbents of certain other positions "used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion," which are considered confidential and which are not subject to inspection or review without the express prior written consent of the… [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:15 pm
While we hope the pain and suffering experienced in these accidents never happen to anyone, these kinds of events are all too common across our state. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm
The post It’s NUT yours, it’s mine: Kraft Foods v Bega Cheese and the importance of intellectual property due diligence appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm
The post It’s NUT yours, it’s mine: Kraft Foods v Bega Cheese and the importance of intellectual property due diligence appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:21 am
From Daurbigney v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
The burden on COM’s cross motion shifted to the Sadiku’s, requiring them to submit evidence showing that there is an issue of fact which must be tried (see Alvarez v Prospect Hospital, supra). [read post]
11 May 2019, 3:24 pm
(Not a typo).United States v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 10:03 am
Importantly, the exemption is not limited to drivers who cross state lines. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:29 pm
Cross Key Waterways, 372 So. 2d 913, 925 (Fla. 1978); Metro. [read post]
