Search for: "Does 1-75"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 4,868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is no longer about figuring out the most sensible reading of statutory language; it is instead about dictating how Congress does its work. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
(1-A) Where the Court grants an interim order under sub-section (1), it shall forthwith cause a notice being not less than seven days notice, together with a copy of such order to be served on the Public Prosecutor and the Superintendent of Police, with a view to give the Public Prosecutor a reasonable opportunity of being heard when the application shall be finally heard by the Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[43] But section 14(a) does not specifically preempt state corporate law or even specifically mention shareholder proposals. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:44 am
Geppert & Maderbacher Rechtsanwälte: Contact Stefan Geppert France On 7 February 2019, Ordinance No. 2019-75 dated 6 February 2019 relating to the preparatory measures for the withdrawal of the UK from the EU with respect to financial services (the Ordinance)[1] was published. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
How does your health care practice or organization define sexual harassment or sexual misconduct? [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:41 pm
One City, Two Legal Systems: Hong Kong Judges’ Role in Rights Violations under the National Security Law May 10, 2023 Introduction (PDF) Since the National People’s Congress Standing Committee of the People’s Republic of China imposed the National Security Law[1] on Hong Kong three years ago, authorities have used it to crack down on … [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Claggett: does it end in termination? [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
In his petition, McCarthy maintains that the clause does not foreclose all judicial review and that other constitutional provisions, such as the quorum clause, indicate that physical attendance is a constitutional requirement. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:28 pm
This section requires written approval by a “covered official”—a service acquisition executive, the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, the USDA&S, or the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USDR&E)—determining that (1) the requirements related to appropriate use of prototype OT authority are met, and (2) the use of the authority is essential to meet critical… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
As Brown J. states, the three elements that must be satisfied for the Federal Court to have jurisdiction are the following: “1. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
It is an audit based agency which does not establish rights to pursue private law suits, but instead reviews contractor establishments to determine compliance. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
Does, for example, the ordinance prohibit bicycles (or unicycles)? [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:01 am
According to § 230, ISPs cannot be made responsible for the content posted by users of the service (§230(c)(1)) regardless of knowledge of its illegality. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
Index of decisions summarized January - June 2008 Click on the title to access the summary published in New York Public Personnel Law A provisional employee's right to a permanent appointment is limited Abandonment of a position in the public service Abandonment of position Ability to perform light duty permits discontinuation of GML Section 207-c benefits Absence during a probationary period Accepting gratuities for performing official duties Accepting job with a vendor while reviewing… [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Scope 3 Emissions SB 253 would direct CARB to develop standards for GHG emissions reporting by January 1, 2025, with covered entities then required to begin annual reports following these standards in 2026 (for scope 1 and scope 2 GHG emissions) and in 2027 (for scope 3 emissions).[21] Scope 1 emissions are those that come directly from a company’s operations, such as its factories, heating plants, and vehicle fleets. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
* * * Summary of Argument 1. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
The law does not permit it. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
County of San Bernardino, 1 Cal.App.5th 677, 690-691 (2016), which concluded a lay person’s opinion based on technical information that requires expertise does not qualify as substantial evidence. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
So if 20% of the APEs vote yes, 5% vote no, and 75% don’t vote at all, Computershare will vote 80% of the preferred stock for yes, which will be enough to pass the amendments even if all of the common stock doesn’t vote (or votes no). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 4:11 pm
Where Does Salmonella Come From? [read post]
