Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 4,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court held in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project that one can be convicted of a crime for violating 18 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:18 am
: Don Henley et al v Charles DeVore etc al (IP Whiteboard) TheFlyOnTheWall.com - Google and Twitter pour cold water on ‘hot news’: Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.com (Ars Technica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Copyright Group - P2P lawyers tell judge: suing 5,000 ‘Does’ at once is fine (ArsTechnica) US Trademarks & Domain Names Online keyword advertising: Misleading customers? [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:59 pm
: Don Henley et al v Charles DeVore etc al (IP Whiteboard) TheFlyOnTheWall.com – Google and Twitter pour cold water on ‘hot news’: Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.com (Ars Technica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Copyright Group – P2P lawyers tell judge: suing 5,000 ‘Does’ at once is fine (ArsTechnica) US Trademarks & Domain Names Online keyword advertising: Misleading customers? [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm
” The case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:35 am
The court held that because any discretion on the part of the City of San Diego (“city”) was limited to aesthetics only, there was no discretionary action triggering supplemental environmental review of climate change impacts.In 1990, the city entered into a development agreement with the United States of America regarding a redevelopment project in downtown San Diego for which an environmental impact report (“EIR”) was certified. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:01 am
Am. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Co. of America, No. 09-15866 (11th Cir. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango) Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW) United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Barney, 129 U.S. 677, 682 (1889), and maintained in United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:11 am
It noted the decision in Vasbinder v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
The Tafas v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:08 am
25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross? [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 7:49 am
United Services Association of America, in 1992. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
In those, 21 or 41% originated from outside the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
(Afro-IP) (IPKat) Spain The Supreme Court deactivates an Italian torpedo – Ferrero v Zaini Luigi (Class 46) Ukraine Commission seeks comments on Ukraine GIs ahead of free trade agreement (Class 46) United Kingdom UK High Court: Why does Newcastle United want to play Sunderland on a Saturday or Sunday? [read post]
