Search for: "English v. English" Results 3981 - 4000 of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by ernst
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and that it has agreed to revisit next Term in Fulton v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:52 am
Maybe it's in their stylebook that all slang must be restated in standard English. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:38 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBristowsby Naomi Hazenberg and Olivia Henry The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in IPCom v HTC ([2017] EWCA Civ 90), the latest instalment of the long running UK litigation on European Patent (UK) 1 841 268. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm by familoo
As a consequence, Munby J’s decision in Mubarak v Mubarak (No.1) [2001] 1 F.L.R. 673 has been overruled and W v H (Family Division: Without Notice Orders) [2001] 1 All E.R. 300 is overruled in part. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:46 pm
Such conclusion would not change whether it is under Indian Law or English Law. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:44 pm
The interests of people in the Indian sub continent are involved and therefore parties cannot be allowed to decide the dispute based on English laws (the agreed law for settlement of dispute). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Joseph Peacock
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:39 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Modules III, V and VI, which address products, contain some common themes. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm by John Culhane
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 8:12 pm
Maine, Ancient Law 1881 French law on freedom of the press 1932 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 1945 Charter of the United Nations 1952 Completion of the Uniform Commercial Code 1957 Civil Rights Act of 1957 1963 Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty 1963 Gideon v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Opinion: “Gary Flood v Times Newspapers” – William Bennett, Inforrm’s Blog: We posted on this case, relating to media freedom of expression, here. [read post]