Search for: "Frank v. Frank" Results 3981 - 4000 of 6,624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2022, 1:12 am by Frank Cranmer
In Abdullah Yalçın (No. 2) v Turkey [2022] ECHR 473, the applicant was a convicted prisoner in a high-security prison. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) At SCOTUSBlog, Lyle Denniston characterizes the oral argument in Sackett v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:51 am
An extensive forensic audit by the State Comptroller determined that, from 1998 through 2004, approximately $11 million had been misappropriated: Assistant Superintendent for Business Pamela Gluckin had stolen over $4.6 million; Superintendent Frank Tassone had taken more than $2.4 million; and Account Clerk Deborah Rigano had received about $300,000. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 11:56 pm by Frank Cranmer
Background In Lindholm and the estate after Leif Lindholm v Denmark [2024] ECHR 835, the applicants were Lilian Elisabeth Lindholm, born in 1953 and the estate of her late husband, Leif Ingolf Lindholm, both of whom were Jehovah’s Witnesses. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 12:53 am by Frank Cranmer
Background In Allouche v France [2024] ECHR 305 [in French], Ms Allouche met B, a bartender, in a café near her workplace, an association working to remember the victims of the Holocaust. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 2:03 am by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Refusal to register church land: Arnavutkoy" in Law & Religion UK, 18 November 2022, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2022/11/18/refusal-to-register-church-land-arnavutkoy/ [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm by Kara OBrien
  While these actions reflect the Commission’s interest in bringing actions against these types of directors, they are consistent with the Commission’s historical practice of pursuing cases against independent directors only when it believes that they personally have engaged in violative conduct or have repeatedly ignored significant red flags  One of the actions was brought as an administrative proceeding instead of as a complaint in federal court and illustrates how the… [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
This would impair the proper functioning of the court by preventing full and frank deliberation and discussion at the pre-judgment stage. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Although he has retired officially and unofficially more times than Frank Sinatra, the IPKat's old friend Tibor Gold MBE (right) does have a habit of emerging when you least expect him to do so. [read post]