Search for: "French v. French"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 5,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2011, 11:10 am
The French Republic didn’t recognize any violation of the Convention. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 11:10 am
The French Republic didn’t recognize any violation of the Convention. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:30 pm
" V&M Star, LP v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm
On February 22th 2011, the application was communicated to the agent of the French government with questions to be answered within 16 weeks. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm
On February 22th 2011, the application was communicated to the agent of the French government with questions to be answered within 16 weeks. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Johns v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:25 am
Relying on article VII of the NYC, the Court was able to bypass the ground for non-recognition under article V 1 (e) – noting that such ground does not exist in the French arbitration law. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am
The White Book, Woodfall and one county court case (Hillbrow (Richmond) Ltd v Alogaily 2005) say that a default judgment isn't good enough. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:20 am
The White Book, Woodfall and one county court case (Hillbrow (Richmond) Ltd v Alogaily 2005) say that a default judgment isn't good enough. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:51 pm
Justice Thomas famously dissented in the excessive punishment prison inmate case of Hudson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:22 pm
A. was wounded in an exchange of fire in the French island of la Reunion. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:22 pm
A. was wounded in an exchange of fire in the French island of la Reunion. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
The history of how this came to be is vexed, and we need not review the involved story of the roles variously played by Professor Glueck, Colonel Chanler, Colonel Bernays, President Roosevelt, Secretary Stimson, Justice Jackson, and Baron Shawcross that led to framing the trial around the crime of aggressive war.[11] As Jonathan Bush has demonstrated, the decision made for sharp disagreements not only among the Allied powers – the French in particular never accepted this stratagem… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:52 pm
On June 25th 1996, the ECHR ruled in judgment Amuur v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:52 pm
On June 25th 1996, the ECHR ruled in judgment Amuur v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
As we saw in NML Capital v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
In Horsmon v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Z v Z [2011] EWHC 2878 (Fam) is, I believe, the first reported pre-nuptial agreement case since Radmacher v Granatino.The facts: Both parties are French. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:27 am
I also have to analyze the recent ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-235/09 Chronopost v DHL [noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
(picture, left - the AmeriKat shouting for England)Tiffany sees blue for Louboutin's red appealAnother American brand that has been doing a fair bit of cheerleading of late, this time for French company Christian Louboutin, is Tiffany & Company. [read post]
