Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 4,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
The Lanham Trademark Act (title 15, chapter 22 of the United States Code) is legislation that contains the federal statutes of trademark law in the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:09 am
Mullin suggests that reporters covering such patent lawsuits should make this much clearer, even suggesting something along the lines of the following:"Picsel, which does not claim that Apple copied its patent or products, is asking for a royalty to be paid on all iPhones sold in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
The question arises in Kucana v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:04 pm
One answer may be found in a decision by EDNY Judge Gleeson, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
Right Side News As discussed in Fallout from the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pt 1, the United States federal government is taking a more and more integral role in the distribution and transmission of electricity and in the energy sector throughout the U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
To mitigate the effect of that violation, Canada must present a request to the United States for Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Holder (08-322). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
United States (No. 08-108), argued earlier this Term, Nijhawan v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
– Andrew Logie on need for fresh business strategy for rights-owning sector (IP finance) Why everybody lost The Pirate Bay trial (TorrentFreak) Swedish anti-piracy office threatens BitTorrent trackers (TorrentFreak) Big Content seeks injunction as Pirate Bay appeals verdict (Ars Technica) Hundreds protest against Pirate Bay decision (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) Pirate Party membership surges following Pirate Bay verdict (TorrentFreak) IFPI site under attack by Pirate Bay supporters… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:22 pm
In January, Lindsay had the privilege of arguing before the United States Supreme Court -- in her first oral argument ever. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 11:35 am
The Chief Justice responded: “General Holder, on behalf of the Court, I welcome you as the chief law officer of the United States government and as an officer of this Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:38 am
Supreme Court ruling in an argued case: The Supreme Court of the United States today issued its ruling in Nken v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:06 am
The decision below, which held for the United States, is vacated and remanded, in an 7-2 opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, available here. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Standard Forex (E.D.N.Y. 1995), and to waive attorney-client and work product protection over the objection of a former corporation officer facing criminal charges, United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:56 am
Utility model protection has resulted in very high damages awards on a case by case basis a trade secret invention practiced in the United States may still be the basis for patenting in other countries; Only the United States adopted the unique bar against patenting an applicant’s secret invention. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
Elena Kagan has yet to argue any cases for the United States and court watchers will be very curious to see which case she chooses as her first. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda) Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch) France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
On remand, the BIA considered classified evidence on Kaur's case and concluded she was "a danger to the security of the United States" based on her involvement "in terrorist activity since entering the United States. [read post]
