Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 3981 - 4000
of 18,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2010, 3:40 am
Beginning in State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
In addition to direct attacks on recovery of success fees or ATE premiums, this decision does arguably re-open the whole issue of “proportionality”. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
Brownlow, No. 08-0551 (DDB); When a law firm must be disqualified because it hired a legal assistant who worked at an opposing law firm (when “reasonable steps” are not taken to shield them from the matter, as was not here) (In re Columbia Health; Whether a water authority must seek voter approval for “every” bond election (here, at least, yes): Kirby Lake Development, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
If you’re not an Internet Law geek, you might decide to stop reading here. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
If that's the case, they're going to be awfully surprised with today's 8-0 ruling in Staub v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:00 am
R. v Hunt, 2016 NLCA 61 [32] In considering the integrity and repute of the justice system, particularly in light of the underlying principles discussed in Jordan, it is relevant to take account of the fact that a person under investigation, prior to a charge being laid, has no control over the process. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
The question before the justices in Percoco v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
Nonelessless, Justice Raye says: Affirmed. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 1:55 pm
Bishop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am
Commentators continue to discuss Monday’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:09 am
"You're not allowed to go out to dinner. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
The 12th District, in State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:08 am
At Monday’s argument in CSX Transportation v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:01 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
There now follows a judicial review of the decision to enforce the possession order made in that claim: JL v SS for Defence [2012] EWHC 2216 (Admin) [not yet on Bailii], heard by Justice Simler QC on 30/7/2012.After the making of the possession order in JL1, the Claimant was accepted for the full homelessness duty by Leeds City Council and she was placed in the highest band on the Council’s allocation scheme. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
There now follows a judicial review of the decision to enforce the possession order made in that claim: JL v SS for Defence [2012] EWHC 2216 (Admin) [not yet on Bailii], heard by Justice Simler QC on 30/7/2012.After the making of the possession order in JL1, the Claimant was accepted for the full homelessness duty by Leeds City Council and she was placed in the highest band on the Council’s allocation scheme. [read post]
