Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 4,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
Kerik ruled like a feudal lord, many former employees have said. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:38 am
So, for this case anyhow, the CYAC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:53 pm
The Telegraph had campaigned hard for this, and the Carnegie UK Trust had championed this idea before the House of Lords Communications Committee. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
The farmer lent a churn to the neighbour who returned it in a damaged state. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
The EBA, while being aware of the use of T258/03-Hitachi and T641/00-Comvik, stated circa May 2010: “We note, in passing, that it is somewhat surprising that the referral does not address any of its questions to the validity of this way of judging an inventive step, an issue which is surely of general interest (and one which Lord Justice Jacob proposed should be put to the Enlarged Board – “How should those elements of a claim that relate to excluded subject… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
When the Reynolds defence was first decided, in the first few cases after the decision was handed down, the defence failed and had to go all the way back up to the House of Lords for the judges of the House of Lords to say to lower courts you are not getting it. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Just click here to see the bills for a specific state. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
David Anderson Q.C.'s (now Lord Anderson) Bulk Powers Reviewrecords (para 2.26(g)) an assurance given by the Home Office that that authority is inherent in clauses 205 and 211 of the Bill (now sections 229 and 235 of the IP Act). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")Todd Rundgren - "Lord Chancellor's Nightmare Song" ("And bound on that journey you find your attorney. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Maolin Ninth Circuit Opinion (ACLU) United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Whether the Lord Bissell lawyers should have gone public with their concerns, blowing the whistle on their client, remains a matter of debate – and that expectation probably went a bit too far. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
