Search for: "M v. M" Results 3981 - 4000 of 53,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am by Eric Goldman
1-800 Contacts first appeared on this blog on February 9, 2005, my second day of blogging. 17 years later, I’m still blogging their ignoble trademark lawsuits. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
“That is the question, easy to ask but not so easy to answer” - as it takes the Court of Appeal 40 pages (right before Christmas, thank you very much, hence this rather late note) to answer that question in R (A) v LB  Croydon; R (M) v LB Lambeth  [2008] EWCA Civ 1445  I’d have to agree. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:00 pm by Gene Quinn
Unfortunately, some simply cannot help themselves but to use every opportunity – real or imagined – to take a cheap shot at a patent owner for having the audacity to seek to enforce patent rights, so it should come as no surprise that false and misleading reports would surface in the life sciences world relating to the latest coronavirus (named SARS-CoV-2) and the disease it causes (named “coronavirus disease 2019” abbreviated COVID-19). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:19 am by Douglas
Proposta execução de sentença, a mãe da vítima indicou à penhora bem imóvel de propriedade do motorista. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm by Neil Cahn
In its February 14, 2013 decision in Melody M. v Robert M., the Third Department affirmed an order of now-retired St. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:55 am
Kerin, Appellate Counsel; and Eric M. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
R (on the application of M) (FC) (Respondent) v Slough Borough Council  [2008] UKHL 52 is a House of Lords case concerning Local Authority obligations under the National Assistance Act 1948, and specifically when the authority is obliged to arrange and pay for accommodation. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:52 am
This post is not from the RS side of the blog.Medtronic removed today’s case, Cole v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:47 am by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
C|M|LAW professor Chris Sagers has contributed to the Walters Kluwer’s AntitrustConnect Blog since March, 2011. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
"] See here; you can read more about the forgeries, and about other kinds of shenanigans in my Hassell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
 I'm particularly pleased that the Court addressed the reasonableness of the OCC's interpretation under Chevron; it was an issue that they avoided in Watters v. [read post]