Search for: "MAY v. MAY" Results 3981 - 4000 of 183,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 2:45 am
In Mr Peter Crowson v HSBC Insurance Brokers Ltd (unreported), the Judge, in considering an application to strike out the claimant's claim, held that an individual who is not in a contractual relationship with an insurance broker may have rights of action in tort and/or contract where the insurance to be arranged is also for his benefit.The claimant was the managing director of a company which had contracted with an insurance broker to effect inter alia a directors and… [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:05 pm
Nevertheless, today the Court of Appeals in Tzolis v Wolff, 2008 NY Slip Op 01260 held that members of a LLC  may bring derivative suits on the LLC's behalf. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
May 3, 2012) has to do with the Circuit’s description of Board of Ed. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm by Phil Cave
The LA Times, and others are reporting PTA negotiations may be ongoing. [read post]
15 May 2008, 1:48 am
R v May (Appellant) (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) [2008] UKHL 28 (14 May 2008) Crown Prosecution Service (Respondents) v Jennings (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 29 (14 May 2008) R v Green (Appellant) (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) [2008] UKHL 30 (14 May 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
In a Franks analysis, the affiant-officer’s law enforcement sources may be questioned, too. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Senate Reintroduces, May Attempt to Advance, Paycheck Fairness Act – Washington, DC lawyer Ilyse Schuman of Littler on the firm’s blog, Washington, DC Employment Law Update Following Kappos v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On Monday, May 3, 2010, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Clayworth v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:06 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall that I previously reported on the household exclusion case of Allstate v. [read post]