Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 3981 - 4000 of 10,420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 7:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The only other evidence arguably proving proximate cause of harm flowing from the false designation was the money Oculus raised from investors in direct connection with the use of the promotional materials containing ZeniMax’s marks. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
But Neutron Depot itself has pointed to no evidence of either lost sales or lost profits in support of its contention it has been financially harmed by Bankrate’s use of the Mark. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Dan Flynn
The Red Hen also was not marking prepared ready-to-eat (RTE) food with “consume by” dates. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
All this rebutted any presumption of injury and of irreparable harm. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:45 am
In his contempt order, Judge Duncan wrote: “The inescapable conclusion is that Defendants are missing the mark after four years of trying to get it right. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am by Amy Howe
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
They're contained in an internal documentdeceptively marked, in all caps, "confidential attorney client work product. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:38 am by Tim Springer
The shortage of workers places disabled people at risk of harm and burden the people who care for them. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:19 am by INFORRM
US legislation focuses more narrowly on whether market dominance leads to demonstrable consumer harm. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:57 am by luiza
The case marks another circuit court’s application of the materiality standard announced in Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
  And they concluded that modern dormant Commerce Clause precedents rest on two primary principles that mark the boundaries of a state authority to regulate interstate commerce.[9]  “First, state regulations may not discriminate against interstate commerce; and second, States may not impose undue burdens on interstate commerce. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Amy Howe
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:02 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Further, the harm was easily traceable from the advertisement as Elanco is the only FDA-approved rbST provider on the market. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:02 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Further, the harm was easily traceable from the advertisement as Elanco is the only FDA-approved rbST provider on the market. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:11 am by SHG
Somebody leaked an internal memo to former ACLU board member Wendy Kaminer, ironically marked at the top, in all caps, “CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT,” which reveals their new perspective on litigation. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Amy Howe
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
The challengers in this case are trying to convince the court that there is some nebulous line marking the boundary of “too much politics” – a boundary that exists nowhere in the text of the Constitution. [read post]