Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3981 - 4000
of 21,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2007, 7:16 am
(See Mark Botti's helpful summary here.) [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
State, supra (quoting Dorsey v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:14 am
The case will mark the first time in more than a decade that the court agreed to take up a central issue of the gun rights debate, something it has consistently ducked since issuing a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
This Kat has received, several times over, the judgment of Mr Justice Birss, in Thomas Pink Ltd v Victoria's Secret UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 2631 (Ch), in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales (doubling as the Community Trade Mark Court), but he has been too busy looking at the pictures doing his tax returns to read the judgment, which is rather long (217 pages plus annexes). [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:29 am
" (quoting Institut Nat’l Des Appellations d’Origine v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 5:29 pm
In State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:45 am
United States National Pageant, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
Mark's Evangelical Lutheran Church and St. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
”” In Lindke v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:27 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:09 pm
It was found that Fanatics infringed FanFirm’s “FANATICS” trade mark; however, FanFirm’s trade mark registrations were still cancelled. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
Dupart v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
A fairly remarkable example is Johnson v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:58 am
” Second, the public closely associates official state license plate designs with the state. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 7:56 am
But that case, Locke v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:48 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:21 am
Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
The GC rejected the arguments and stated that it is up to the applicant for a trade mark, who claims that it is distinctive and who has detailed knowledge of the relevant market, to provide concrete and substantiated indications that the trade mark applied for has inherent distinctive character or has acquired such character through use (T-127/06). [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
