Search for: "Marshall " Results 3981 - 4000 of 22,428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2020, 3:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Marshall, fearful of appearing as if he were plotting some kind of a coup, resolutely stayed in the background. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published 2-1 majority opinion filed April 7, 2020, written by Justice Wiley and joined by Presiding Justice Bigelow, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 8) affirmed a judgment upholding the EIR for Tesoro’s “Los Angeles Refinery Integration and Compliance Project. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 8:02 am by Howard Bashman
Pierce has a post titled “You Know Something’s Up When Neil Gorsuch Sounds — For a Moment — Like Thurgood Marshall; By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a fair trial also guarantees a unanimous verdict for conviction in state courts. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Marshals Service then legally seized those meat and poultry articles but left them in place (frozen and stored) at Miller’s pending a condemnation hearing. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by Jonathan F. Marshall
Marshall can advise you of your rights and assist you in developing a suitable plan of action in your case. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, the first casebooks in constitutional law, at the turn of the 20th century, began with treatments of constitutional amendment inasmuch as their authors correctly recognized, as John Marshall put it in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 7:52 am by Casey Flaherty
A legal project manager involved in matter planning can assist lawyers in marshaling the full array of available resources, from technology to knowledge assets to cost-advantaged service centers, to meet client needs. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
The Marshall Project recently published an article detailing how public access to American court proceedings “has been spotty as each court comes up with its own rules on the fly” in this era of physical distancing requirements. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 11:27 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
The motion court correctly concluded that documentary evidence, including emails and transaction documents, rendered it “essentially undeniable” that plaintiffs were advised of and/or otherwise understood the terms of the transactions they entered into in 2014 and 2015, as well as their alternative options, if any (see Amsterdam Hospitality Group, LLC v Marshall-Alan Assoc., Inc., 120 AD3d 431, 432 [1st Dept 2014] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm by Katie Bart
Before the court marshals hand out the first 50 public-line tickets at 7:30 a.m., the court does not monitor the line. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 10:44 am by Sophie Corke
Further details can be found here.On a brighter note, the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys has a dizzying array of online events, as well as (future) conferences and meetups for its members to choose from, listed here.Lastly, the Center for Intellectual Property, Information and Privacy Law at UIC John Marshall Law School has announced that its 11th Annual Ethics in the Practice of IP Law Seminar will take place online on 5 June 2020. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by mes286
University of Florida Levin College of Law – Yvette Lind, Assistant Professor, Copenhagen Business School, presents today as part of the UF Law Tax Colloquium, sponsored by the Marshall M. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Marshall Project – Volunteers who monitor courts across the country say they are getting little access to online-only proceedings. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 1:54 pm by Dan Filler
I was asked by the leadership of the Law and Society Association to post this letter responding to Bridget Crawford's posts about the LSA conference here and here. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 12:33 pm by Stan Gibson
” The court disagreed with this argument, reasoning that “[t]he fact that defendants’ replacement expert found additional prior art and publications that he deemed relevant to the validity of the `645 patent provided no justification for why the defendants or their prior expert did not marshal the same evidence from at least 25 years ago in a more timely fashion.2 The defendants may not exploit the need to replace a deceased expert as an excuse to belatedly make… [read post]