Search for: "People v. House"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 11,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
All this radically differs from the all-powerful image that many people have of Senator McConnell. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Hildenbrand, No. 07-10210, 07-10211 Defendants' guilty plea convictions for defrauding the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are affirmed over claims of error regarding the sufficiency of the factual resumes submitted in support of defendants' guilty pleas. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm
Housing of transgender inmates 10. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:48 pm
” Yet in 1998, Southwick agreed in Richmond v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Here's another such case (which I think expresses what today would be the minority view), from 1913 Arkansas, Moore v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:10 am
The people just entering foreclosure now may find themselves ending the process with a wounded bank on the other side of the "v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Last month, in Byrd v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 69, 71, 72; Plessy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
Michael v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
If you are one of the two people who read last week’s installment, you are already about ninety percent up to speed on this week’s relists and you can stop reading now. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
If you are one of the two people who read last week’s installment, you are already about ninety percent up to speed on this week’s relists and you can stop reading now. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:59 am
House of Representatives (BLAG, the group defending the law since the Department of Justice has declined to do so) that the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2007, 8:52 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
"The Fourth Amendment protects "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:33 am
This week the Florida Supreme Court in Matarranz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
It’s different working with someone who prefers logic and consistency v. those who focus instead on the people and circumstances. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
The GG v. [read post]
