Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 3981 - 4000 of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am by Eric Goldman
In our view, people who are subject to decisions made by law enforcement may fairly question whether these online statements about race, religion, ethnicity and the acceptability of violent policing—among other topics—inform officers’ on-the-job behaviors and choices. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 2:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Supreme Court 2020) The question in this case is whether the Federal Reserve Banks are people. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:33 pm by Unknown
Peyote crisis confronting modern Indigenous peoples: The declining peyote population and a demand for conservation. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A nice summary of the meaning of these requirements in the context of criminal law provisions was provided by Lord Hope in R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345, at paragraph 41: Accessibility means that an individual must know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the court’s interpretation of it what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable: see also Gülmez v Turkey (Application No… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:26 pm by Harry Styron
People ought to be bound by what they sign, especially when it comes to real estate. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
The arrested person should provide a list of people who may be willing to cooperate to his or her lawyer. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Many of the cases involved the arrest of people who had posted critical remarks about politicians on social networking sites. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm by Steve Schultze
Yesterday, I attended oral arguments in the Supreme Court case of McBurney v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
"The American people have no reason in the world to think it's going to work just like the president paints it," said one of those backers, Senator Pete V. [read post]