Search for: "People v. Render" Results 3981 - 4000 of 5,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2009, 9:00 pm
Accordingly, though Sotomayor explicitly states that she agrees that judges must neutralize the weight of their own personal experiences, she rejects the impulse to analyze this process simplistically:I am reminded each day that I render decisions that affect people concretely and that I owe them constant and complete vigilance in checking my assumptions, presumptions and perspectives and ensuring that to the extent that my limited abilities and capabilities permit me, that I… [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
This is an example of how mediation can offer creative, “win-win” solutions. https://www.cafa.world/ARBITRATION In arbitration, parties agree to submit their dispute to an “arbitrator” – a neutral third party – who is granted the power to render a binding decision on their conflict.[9] The parties are given the opportunity to present their case by providing testimony, giving evidence, and questioning witnesses. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Yannotti, No. 065571 Conviction and sentence for conspiring to engage in racketeering in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was not legally sufficient to establish defendant's conviction for RICO conspiracy; 2) the district court erred in admitting the contents of two intercepted phone calls and allowing a witness to interpret those phone calls; 3) one of the racketeering acts alleged in the indictment… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
For some related though different thoughts on the subject by Justice Scalia, see his concurrence in Sable Communications v. [read post]