Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 3981 - 4000 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2020, 4:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/ Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:00 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
” The United States signed the Convention in 1988, and Congress implemented the Convention Against Torture in domestic law, by the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring (FARR) Act, codified at 8 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
The City of Los Angeles recently filed two separate lawsuits in California state court concerning substantial losses it allegedly suffered as a result of municipal bonds it previously issued.The first lawsuit, entitled City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:03 am
"[i]Watson was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and alleges violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, and California's Cartwright and Unfair Competition Acts. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm by Jon Sands
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:53 pm by Barry Barnett
And they brought the action in California -- not where Daimler's main United States sub (Mercedes-Benz USA or MBUSA) had incorporated (Delaware) or the state in which MBUSA kept its main place of business. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Kate Mancuso
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
This morning at 9:30, the Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District will hear oral argument in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
Justice Mihara dissents.The majority opinion contains the following opening paragraph:"The sole issue in this appeal is whether "the role of the jury [is] diminished and eroded in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution" by the use of juvenile adjudications to increase the maximum punishment for an offense, in light of the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Apprendi v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am by Scott Bomboy
” The United States has filed a brief in the case and asked to take part in arguments. [read post]