Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 3981 - 4000 of 14,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
The derivative action as far as I know is authorized by statute and/or common law in every state. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1]The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3]Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans a [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 10:15 am by Eric Goldman
More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts: * Section 230 Doesn’t End Lawsuit Claiming Facebook Facilitated Sex Trafficking–Doe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Thankfully, there is a growing body of work on Reich and his legacy. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Chris Hajec
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the court opined that when reviewing an administrative determination rendered after a hearing that is required by law, the court's standard is whether the determination "is, on the entire record, supported by substantial evidence" which is a "minimal standard ... demand[ing] only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]