Search for: "State v. Church"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 5,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
United States Department of Health and Human Services , Case No. 6:22-cv-450-JDK (E.D. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:11 am
«Such is also the meaning of the Responsum of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which states that the Church does not have the power to impart blessings on unions of persons of the same sex» (5). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
Specifically, the defendant objected to the admission of questions and testimony about whether the defendant’s father warned members of the church about the defendant’s potential dangerousness. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
CRUM, Defendant.Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-3522-B.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Read with modern spectacles Jacobson looks extraordinarily deferential to the state. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:00 am
In 1927, the case of Willett v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
Alabama still can’t bar them from enrolling, since the Supreme Court declared in Plyler v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 6:01 am
Furthermore, a Pike v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles: The Court upheld a decision by California courts that a parish splitting off from the Episcopal Church could not take parish property with it. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Nearly a decade later, in Hill v Church of Scientology, the Court clarified that this residual relevance obliges courts to engage in principled balancing, weighing Charter values against “the principles which underlie the common law,” and using those values as “guidelines for any modification to the common law which the court feels is necessary” (Hill, para 97). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
v=8BDrhsHosIY. 4. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
Smith and Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
New Mexico state government Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Tribal In-House Counsel Assn. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Here is the legal section:In "Lying" about sexual orientation in a rape trial posted at Polymorphous Perversity, we get a discussion about a Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals ruling that a defendant on trial for rape had no right to introduce testimony relating to the alleged victim's sexual orientation.In A Supreme Court Victory For School Sexual Harassment Cases posted at Gender & Sexuality Law Blog, we get a discussion of the results of Fitzgerald v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 8:52 pm
Despite these protections, the Supreme Court stated in the largest libel case in Canada, Hill v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:42 am
As the incident with Zed indicates, what happened to Catholics then seems to be happening to other religious groups now -- a frequent church/state theme these days. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:43 pm
Not a day goes by, it seems, without a constitutional wink to the right on guns (he thinks there is an individual right to own one), the wall of separation between church and state (he thinks it can be lowered), the Fourth Amendment prohibition on warrantless wiretapping (he's changed his position on FISA), and on the death penalty for noncapital child rape cases (he thinks it's constitutional) as well as a possible shift this week on the right to abortion (which… [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:30 am
” In an op-ed at the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Daniel Cotter looks at the recent decision in Opati v. [read post]
