Search for: "State v. Gross"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 4,577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Kentucky today and Perdue v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
The course will also provide those who intend to practice Climate Change Law & Policy in the United States a better understanding of the rationales for the international, national and state mechanisms adopted to face this major problem.Methodology. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:32 pm
Scalera v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
The New York Times reports that Democrats in Congress have introduced a bill to undo the Court ruling last June in Gross v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
" Enbridge, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:25 pm
The Congressional response to Gross v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:26 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument this afternoon in Pierron v Pierron, Case No. 138824. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:16 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Gross v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:42 pm
In the case of Van Horn v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:23 am
In Rhodes v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
Green v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:52 pm
United States, 599 F.Supp.2d 678, 690 (E.D.N.C. 2008)(overstatement of basis can constitute an omission from gross income for purposes of the six-year period of limitations) and Brandon Ridge Partners v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:24 am
Michael Foreman from my undergrad alma mater, Penn State, where he directs the Civil Rights Appellate Clinic at the law school; andJack Gross, plaintiff in Gross v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:35 pm
The State is doing nothing of the kind; they are taxing the individual with reference to certain facts. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:16 pm
The State is doing nothing of the kind; they are taxing the individual with reference to certain facts. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:57 pm
AstraZeneca v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
§2902, is fairly apportioned under the Commerce Clause, when the State taxes Ford Motor Company based on the fact that its goods were "physically delivered" into the State, and whether this gross receipts tax as a transaction tax on the seller that only one State has the right to tax, rather than as a tax on income that must be apportioned, violates the Commerce Clause by permitting the taxation of sales that occur outside the… [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
