Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 8,246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Emily Phelps recounts the testimony of North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposed constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform in light of the Chief Justice’s comments on donor influence in McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Another reminder of the oft-repeated rule that only a rights holder may sue to defend those rights, and associations that claim to represent rights holders but do not own any rights are not proper plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:32 pm
’s ban on handguns (Heller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am
Even under Kelo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
The recent jury verdict in the Zwerner case in Miami, Florida (U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
" Mota v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
In the case of Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others, case C‑360/13,The Court of Justice of the European Union has held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, with PRCA director general Francis Ingham saying: "We are utterly delighted that the CJEU has accepted all of our arguments against the NLA". [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
Not only is the Court just about to rule in in Case C-360/13 Public Relations Consultants Association v Newspaper Licensing Agency, but Advocate General (AG) Jääskinen has just released his Opinion [not yet available] in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:23 am
It would be possible to design browsing software without an internet cache, but in the present state of technology the result would be that the internet would be unable to cope with current volumes of traffic and would not function properly. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:01 am
The Court’s unanimous opinion in Limelight Networks v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
From Renna v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:55 am
In Limelight Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
On May 19, the Supreme Court decided Petrella v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:02 pm
The ECJ did specify that should the content be made only available to subscribed users, and the service, such as Retriever's, would circumvent that pay-wall, it would clearly be beyond the anticipation of the copyright holders when authorizing the communication of their works.The ECJ also rejected the potential of allowing Member States to widen their range of what can be seen as a communication to the public, as it would create uncertainty within the Union as to what would… [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
See Holder v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:18 am
Deutscher Tennis Bund] to non-stock corporations, and to make clear that such liability may not be imposed on holders of stock in stock corporations. [read post]
