Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 76,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:45 pm
Steneken, 183 N.J. 290, 299 (2005) (reiterating the principles stated in Rothman). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
Applying Yerodia, the Appeals Chamber of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (“SCSL”) ruled in its Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Slater (that's Germany the person, not the Federal Republic) promises: Over the past 17 years, this judicial officer has served as a municipal judge, a state district judge, a state appellate judge, and, now as a United States district judge. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
Elizabeth's Child Care Center v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 11:15 pm
The Alliance Defense Fund announced yesterday that a settlement agreement (full text) has been filed in Wesselius v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:49 am
The plaintiff in Sean R. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has also been clear that state laws that stand as obstacles to the objectives or means used in federal laws are also preempted, which was the claim made here when the United States sued over the Arizona law that avowedly sought to “discourage and deter unlawful entry and presence of aliens and economic activity by persons unlawfully present in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:42 am
Rocke v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 8:27 am
The majority distinguishes the old Supreme Court Keeton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:05 pm
The case is Nabors Wells Servs. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
In State of Ohio v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]