Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 36,680
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
[Presumably this concurrence went to press before Price was able to read Arizona v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:55 pm
As he points out, in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:08 pm
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
That is a highly contestable assumption, particularly in the modern administrative state and given modern congressional practice. [8] Indeed, such a mode of interpretation would confront Congress with an unenviable choice that could lead to more, not less, capacious delegations of quasi-legislative powers to agencies. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:04 am
In the other case, U.S. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 20 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in an proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:01 am
Additional Resources: Griffin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:06 am
United States (09-936), Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen – Self Insurers Fund v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
On a quick reflection, it seems likely to me that this language was understood to give power to the legislatures of the states, acting pursuant to their (state) constitutional procedures. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc.), and one in California state court (Garcia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am
It grew more complex as an array of state and non-state actors took sides in Assad’s civil war and terrorist groups also began vying for territory and control. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am
Choice of Law and Stromberg v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:19 am
Here are the materials in WPX Energy Williston LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
[1] Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
.* The issue before the Supreme Court in Knox v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:36 pm
The defendant further stated that the judge had a personal dislike for the defendant’s counsel which he demonstrated with the aid of the People v Oberoi in which the defense counsel appeared in front of the judge to conduct a pre-trial suppression hearing. [read post]
