Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 14,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 8:31 am
The Supreme Court on June 19 unanimously vacated and remanded an Eleventh Circuit per curiam decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:36 am
Winstead v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 2:44 am
Chang v Yi Lin 2024 NY Slip Op 33338(U) September 20, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 161222/2023 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm
” Bing Shun Li v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 1:04 pm
” Nguyen, slip op. at 23 (citing Mullins v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
For example, Randall v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:59 am
See State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
Direct Marketing Assoc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
Smith v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/index.html Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlDrake v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 11:24 am
G.B. and L.B. on behalf of N.B. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
The legislative intent of §36, said the court, was "to enable a town or village to rid itself of an unfaithful or dishonest public official," citing Matter of Miller v Filion, 304 AD2d 1016.In the words of the court, "It is firmly established that removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 is unwarranted in the absence of allegations of "self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional… [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 4:26 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer previews City of Hays v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
In the People v Asmar the prosecution sought permission to adduce evidence about the defendant’s past with the complainant. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The post Justice Stevens's Papers Reveal How The Fortune Cookies Were Baked In <I>Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:00 am
Evidence must always be sufficiently clear, convincing and cogent to satisfy the “balance of probabilities” test stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in F.H. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
Prager Univ. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:36 am
Jones, of US v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:37 pm
The payment and plan resolve the United States’ allegations that during the period from April 30, 2011, through April 30, 2013, CVS pharmacies failed to provide effective controls and procedures to guard against diversion when CVS allegedly failed to: (1) record the amount received and the date received of Schedule II drugs on DEA-222 Forms; (2) maintain DEA-222 Forms and keep them separate from other records; (3) record the date of acquisition of controlled substances in Schedules II… [read post]
