Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
But courts have universally narrowed this language to protect only people with a commercial interest, not consumers. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:35 am
The bill which is currently in the Senate Committee proposes to require Internet companies to clearly disclose the terms of the offers to consumers, and to obtain consumers' billing information, including full credit or debit card numbers, directly from the consumers. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm
UPDATE: To answer a question that came up in the comments: 1. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
What protection should be afforded small businesses? [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am
Section 144 makes the process of service of summons simpler and cuts down the long time ordinarily consumed in service of summons in a regular civil suit or a criminal trial. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) (where the defendant wasn’t very “international”), and World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:53 am
Congress, by turn referee, judge, and placard-changer in between rounds, has kept an eye on both boxers, balancing concerns that the $25 billion dollar purse up for grabs in this fight doesn’t disappear against worries that consumers’ privacy interests aren’t adequately protected. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 4:50 am
Consider, for example, the allegations in Edwards v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
Coffin v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
Not too long ago we offered considerable criticism of certain aspects – specifically the treatment of Pennsylvania consumer fraud claims – in Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:40 pm
Right… perhaps the Internet’s Director of Operations can issue all companies and consumers one of those Staples “EASY” buttons for their desks, except this one would just say “ERASE” and magically clean up our online pasts! [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
But does antitrust law exist to protect consumers? [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
Sept. 23, 2010) [PDF] on the class' claims under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, as well as theories of breach of implied warranty of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:14 pm
McAfee bills itself as a company who makes available products to protect consumers from shady websites and software, but taking plaintiffs' allegations as true, isn't McAfee engaging in the very conduct that its services are designed to protect against? [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
Such laws do not protect consumers — they protect established companies against fair competition. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:00 am
Take, for example, the case of Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
.] : Yale University Press, c2010Environmental LawGE180 .E637 2010Environmental protection policy and experience in the U.S. and China's western regions / edited by Sujian Guo, Joel J. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Hardly any tax pros are willing to work on complicated, time consuming cases like this without getting paid. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:37 am
Special advocates should not be used in international forced marriage cases – New High Court judgment: In Chief Constable & Anor v YK & Ors, the High Court has ruled that special advocates (lawyers instructed to handle security-sensitive evidence in special private hearings) should almost never be used in proceedings to protect a person from a forced marriage (see Paras 88 to 93). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
The Court cited Rubin v. [read post]
