Search for: "U. S. Federal Government"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 5,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
See, e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, 42 U. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:43 pm
See 29 U. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm
U. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm
United States, 544 U. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:54 am
The relationship between assignor and assignee is to be governed by the law applicable to the contract between them and the position of the debtor is to be determined by the law governing the assigned claim. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
U. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
As Jennifer Klinck and Madelaine Mackenzie write in The Globe and Mail, …[U]nequal distribution of wealth and social standing amplifies some voices and silences others. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
S. 601, 306 U. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
That lawsuit produced a game-changer Ninth Circuit decision that has become the flagship federal opinion on account terminati0ns and content removals. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:33 am
Nov. 18, 2021) The court literally could not be bothered to explain itself beyond a cite to Prager U: The district court properly dismissed Perez’s action because Perez failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim….see also Prager U. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
S. in 2009. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
EEOC, 565 U. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:31 pm
The police officer did a U turn to follow the high-beam enthusiast. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:59 pm
For example, when I was hired by York University, I was automatically covered by the collective agreement between York and the York U. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:53 am
Roy, 401 U. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 3:53 pm
Second, how can government agencies structure social media policies while complying with the First Amendment’s free speech guarantee. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
” And an important federal statute says that “u]ntil a State is redistricted in the manner provided by the law thereof after any apportionment, the Representatives to which such State is entitled under such apportionment shall be elected in [a particular way]. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
” And an important federal statute says that “u]ntil a State is redistricted in the manner provided by the law thereof after any apportionment, the Representatives to which such State is entitled under such apportionment shall be elected in [a particular way]. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 pm
And on Public Citizen's proposition, we and PC are in rare agreement – except for the rogue Conte decision, and a stray federal district court thumbing its nose at Erie federalism, the score’s on the order of 55-2. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:49 pm
Today we are holding the Cuban Government accountable for seizing American assets. [read post]
