Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 6,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (Case No. 10-56017) ruled partially in favor of NRDC, et al [See WIMS 3/11/11] and overturned a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of two municipal entities and Los Angeles County. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:59 am
The Ninth Circuit previously concluded in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 10:24 am
One complicating factor is a recent rejection of the government's approach by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
United States Dep't of Agriculture, 673 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:27 am
Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to establish that, in order to defeat the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff needed to demonstrate enough allegations of fact to make his claims facially plausible. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:42 pm
However, at least two pending cases should clarify whether and when employers must provide seats – a case against Bank of America that is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, and a case against K-Mart that is now being tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 11:26 am
However, at least two pending cases should clarify whether and when employers must provide seats – a case against Bank of America that is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, and a case against K-Mart that is now being tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:53 am
Everything else, including identifying information such as the IP address used to access the account requires only a subpoena.One complicating factor is a recent rejection of the government’s approach by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 3:39 pm
However, at least two pending cases should clarify whether and when employers must provide seats – a case against Bank of America that is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, and a case against K-Mart that is now being tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:57 pm
The petition also criticizes the Court of Appeals’ decision for failing to take seriously the searching inquiry under Rule 23 required by the Dukes Court. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 6:58 am
Wallace and United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 6:25 am
” To illustrate: A 2007 case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit involved an employer who offered truck driving training to potential employees provided that the employees signed a contract obligating them to remain with the company for a certain period of time. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 8:17 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’ decisions (Arizona Cattle Growers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
In a leading case, the Ninth Circuit stated that “the addition of the words ‘to authorize’ in the 1976 Act appears best understood as merely clarifying that the Act contemplates liability for contributory infringement . . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 8:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:09 am
(A federal district court in the Ninth Circuit (in Office of Personnel Management v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:08 am
United States v. [read post]
